Recently, WeChat and Weibo had been flooded with posts of "Insisting on the Death Penalty for Child Trafficking." It had almost swept across the Internet, and people were discussing this topic all the time. Although this matter might be a marketing method by a certain network to exploit people's psychology, the topic itself was indeed worthy of people's careful consideration.
Those criminals who harmed the lives of others were sentenced to death, but why were those who harmed the lives of children not sentenced to death?
An associate professor named Lu something at Northwest University for Nationalities also said that many netizens' expressions tended to be emotional, which was a kind of follower and vassal state. It was the "mob phenomenon" of mass psychology. When people felt that they could not go against the law, they were more willing to express their dissatisfaction through this kind of catharsis.
Follower? Vassal? Why didn't people actively follow and vassal other things? Mob catharsis? Because of this sentence, Wen Xiao did not admit that this guy was a bullsh * t professor.
Also, those bullsh * t experts, if they let the traffickers take away all the children in their families, they would not think that this proposal was unreliable.
What did that professor from the University of Political Science and Law say? He said that the proposal of the death penalty for all traffickers who abducted women and children was "very unreliable," had no theoretical basis, and was contrary to the spirit of the law.
He said that if all traffickers were sentenced to death, not only would the criminals have the mentality of having nothing left to lose, but they would also become outlaws, "Anyway, abducting one person is a death penalty, abducting two people is also a death penalty."
But if they were not sentenced to death, would the traffickers stop after abducting one person?
They did not stop, right? Traffickers who abducted children were all f * cking gangs!
Then should the murderers not be sentenced to death? Killing one person was also death, killing two people was also death! The murderers were sentenced to death because they had nothing left to lose? That was why they became outlaws?
Bullsh * t, all of this was bullsh * t!
Child trafficking destroyed lives, and was more abominable than murderers who destroyed other people's lives! A human life could not be taken away, but could it be that a human life could be understood if it was taken away?
What did it mean that the plot was not serious? For the trafficked children and the families of the trafficked children, this was the most f * cking serious plot! Kidnapping someone else's child was more painful than killing himself! How could it be that the plot wasn't serious?
Yes, everyone knows the law. For the ringleader of a criminal group that abducts and sells children, the principal offender or recidivist with serious circumstances, the theft of infants, the abduction of children, the abduction of children, the abduction of children abroad with serious circumstances, the abduction of children for many times, causing casualties, or other serious circumstances, they will be severely punished according to law. If the circumstances are especially serious, they will be sentenced to death according to law.
Was this the only way to sentence him to death? How many criminals who abducted children had the mentality of "I won't die if I abduct one child. At most, I'll be sentenced to a few years in prison." When they abducted a second child, their mentality was still "I won't be sentenced to death if I abduct two children. At most, I'll be sentenced to a dozen years in prison."
Mentality? Which moral professor was talking about mentality? Hmm, then everyone can talk to him about their attitudes. Everyone knew how to analyze a person's state of mind, and whoever analyzed it would be the one who was right!
In fact, this matter was as simple as that. It was fine if the experts felt that this matter should not be sentenced to death, but there was no need to preach to others with that bullsh * t logic of moral coercion. It was wrong to say that the theory of the death penalty was wrong.
There was no right or wrong in this! Even if there was right or wrong, it did not necessarily mean that what the experts said was right.
Of course, the experts would use the phrase "the truth is always on the side of the minority" to speak … Everyone knew why the professors were called "beasts" by netizens, and why the experts were called "experts" by netizens. Why did everyone not make fun of others?
It was because the "experts" had let out too many tasteless farts, and said too many disgusting and hateful conclusions. That was why they were called "experts" by others.
A conservative estimate was that there were 200,000 missing children in Hua Xia every year!!! Now, a child was the darling of at least six adults. How many families would be torn apart by 200,000 missing children?
The online survey was also out. 60,000 netizens participated in the survey, and 81.3% of the participants agreed with the "death penalty for child abduction!"
Teacher Huang Lei's Weibo also said, "I support the death penalty! Especially the buyers! As parents, kill them on sight! "
How many parents had these words spoken in their hearts?
Even a criminal like Yi Wenguang, who had done so many heartless things, felt that human traffickers were more abominable than they were! Even a damned piece of trash like him was more humane than those "experts".
At least, that was what Wen Xiao felt. In terms of the heavy punishment rate, the heavy punishment rate for intentional homicide was 82.02%, the heavy punishment rate for kidnapping was 79.33%, and the heavy punishment rate for child abduction was 56.59%. Perhaps some of the "experts" were starting to say that this was very high! It was even higher than the rape and drug-related underworld gangs!
If Xu Yun were in front of these "experts", he would definitely give them a tight slap and ask them why they were so high!
Was there a big difference between child abduction and kidnapping? F * ck, kidnapping still knew how to ask for a ransom and not kill the child! If the child abductors only sold the child for such a small amount of money, they might as well ask the parents to buy the child back!
As parents, they would rather encounter a kidnapper and ask for a hundred thousand or eighty thousand to redeem the child than to have the child taken to an unknown place. Selling the child for thirty to fifty thousand was already considered high. Some even sold for three to five thousand! Using animals as an analogy to human traffickers was an insult to the word "animals"!
Director Chen of the Ministry of Public Security's Anti-Abduction Office had already said that due to the huge harm caused by child abduction, the death penalty should be applied to serious human traffickers in accordance with the law to deter crime!
Those "experts" continued to argue. Don't use the means of moral coercion and don't use the social trend. Those were too far-fetched excuses.
Let's talk about the facts! Those "experts" who believed that human traffickers should not be given the death penalty were a bunch of f * cking inhumane dogs!
They felt that they did not know their f * cking surname after wearing the hat of "experts"! If their children were really abducted and sold, they would definitely shout louder than the other. They would definitely support killing those damn human traffickers more than the other!
As long as the matter did not involve them, it was a small matter. This was the basic principle of "experts".
"Second Boss, do you think that the death penalty for child trafficking should be supported?" Wen Xiao smiled slightly. "I support it."
"I definitely support it too. I will be sentenced to death if I am caught. There is no discussion. If they don't sentence me to death, I will not be convinced! " Yi Wenguang said, "If human traffickers are not given the death penalty, the law will have no dignity at all. Who will be afraid?"
Wen Xiao nodded. "I think that the next time you deal with human organs, you should deal with those" experts ". Without them, the Internet will be much cleaner. There will not be so many people scolding you. Instead, they will say that you are being extreme. They are the ones who are forcing the netizens to be extreme, and they are the ones who are playing the blame game. "
"Hahaha, this is a good suggestion. I will really consider it!" Yi Wenguang laughed.
You've already exceeded your reading limit for today. If you want to read more, please log in.
Login
Select text and click 'Report' to let us know about any bad translation.
