This book is coming to an end. I haven't talked to everyone for a long time, so I came to say a few words today.
Let's focus on the main point. Let's talk about the rhythm of the book review and the composition of the rhythm. To put it bluntly, this is the same as beliefs. Everyone has their own beliefs. But for things like beliefs, as long as there is a common belief, you can discuss it and speak your mind freely. If there is a difference in beliefs, and you drag others to talk about beliefs, then it could be an accident.
All this while, I've been rather Buddhist and rarely argue about anything. I don't think there's a need.
But this book is coming to an end, and I want to be Taoist. That's right, I'm being honest today. I'm also here to set the pace, but I won't set the pace of others, only my own.
The pace I want to set:
First, there's an interesting discussion in the book review section. This author's four chapters don't have more words than others.
The word count of a chapter in the female genre is basically a thousand words per chapter, calculated by the backend. If you're looking at a chapter with more than four times the word count of mine, that means that other books have more than four thousand words per chapter, or that I only have about two hundred words per chapter. Can you understand it this way?
Fortunately, I've studied mathematics and can count well. Even more fortunately, I don't believe in the backend computer's data. I counted every word, and that's weird. Each chapter has at least a thousand words. Of course, it could also be that I'm not good at math and can't count well. In that case, I can only apologize to some readers and ask them to forgive me for being a math trash.
Second, the most common diss in the book review section, hydrology.
This is even more interesting. What is hydrology, where is the boundary of hydrology, how to judge hydrology, and the composition of a chapter, other than the various necessary plot foreshadowing, what is the point of water, the composition of water, what is it?
Acting cool and face-slapping plots usually have a small climax or a big climax, and the scene of this plot is usually a completely unfamiliar scene. For example, tonight's banquet, it's in a banquet hall that I've described for the first time.
As you can see, I've tried my best to omit the description of the scene. Instead, I've introduced and described some characters, including passersby and onlookers, to increase the readers' sense of immersion, so that the readers can familiarize themselves with the scene. It indirectly tells you what the occasion is like, how grand it is, who's participating, and how everyone's attitude is.
If there were no onlookers, no villains, and nothing at all, just a few main characters, who would I be slapping in the face for?
I had racked my brains to come up with the best way to describe what people were thinking and what kind of conversation they would have in order to maximize the pleasure of slapping someone in the face.
Perhaps one sentence that was not on point would ruin the feeling of the entire plot. Because of this, I would often change the text countless times. Sometimes, I knew that the sentence was wrong, but I didn't know what was wrong. I would compete with myself and change it until I was satisfied.
A book with more than a million words, chapter by chapter, and the essence of each word. There was no need for any foreshadowing or mental activity. I could write what everyone wanted, wanted to see, and looked forward to. I'm sorry, with my current level of writing, I don't have this ability.
Of course, later on, I would ask some literature professors how I could write the atmosphere and climax without any foreshadowing. When I returned from my studies, I would write a novel with ten thousand words, and it would be no less exciting than a few hundred words. Then, I would win a literature award or something.
Actually, the so-called 'water' was just because you personally felt that it was unnecessary. You might think that you didn't want to read this part, but this couldn't represent the masses. I've said it a hundred times, you don't like eating vegetables, you like eating meat, but you can't announce to the world that vegetables are not nutritious. That's the logic of bandits.
Third, the issue of updating.
Indeed, my updating speed wasn't fast, especially in the later stages. When it reached the grand finale, I needed to be even more cautious, and my updating speed would decrease.
All along, if there was a lack of updates, I would always make up for it. It was only in the two months after the grand finale that the number of updates decreased to a certain extent. As for the reason, I had already explained to everyone. It was indeed because I was exhausted. In addition, there was no more suspense in the later parts, so everyone would feel more relaxed.
Regarding the updating speed, I had already said too many times. This was my own problem. Since the problem existed, I wouldn't run away from it. There was nothing to say about this, so I would work hard to increase the efficiency of my writing.
Of course, I didn't want the updating speed to be a reason for some pirated readers to become bandits.
You've already exceeded your reading limit for today. If you want to read more, please log in.
Login
Select text and click 'Report' to let us know about any bad translation.
